For the Skeptics, page-13

  1. 2,118 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch.  13
    And I guess that the reason I am labouring this point is because in the op Nic Sharav claims to have scientifically tested and have empirical evidence of all the facets of the Galactic Cosmic Ray theory of climate modulation.

    And I am surprised that after several decades of CO2 as ghg theory and the probably now millions of scientists that are researching this field of inquiry and the level of public and political coverage of climate science, that there is not perhaps a singular famous experiment (or series of experiments) that have measured in the atmosphere the level of IR radiation in discreet bands that CO2 has absorbed. Measured the net warming effect in the atmosphere of that IR absorption. Shown that at current levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, that not all of the IR radiation that CO2 absorbs has been absorbed (by CO2 or any other gas). Etcetera.

    After all, this is science. And that dictates any theory be falsifiable and able to be tested. And it remains a theory, (and just one of many theories of climate science) rather than fact, until tested and proven, no?
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.