Look back on the last year and think of one thing that Matt has...

Look back on the last year and think of one thing that Matt has done that has not benefited others. The cap raise last year happened to be done at a great time with less dilution. The locked in money for phase 2 was beautifully played. So whilst I take on board the No explanation, I think I will vote Yes. The ability of a prudent board to make a decision without asking our approval has to be considered in every situation and my faith is with Matt wholeheartedly. How would you feel if a billion dollar dermo company was allowed to take a fifteen percent stake in BOT? Pretty damn good I imagine. Just wait for the dermatits results and I think more ideas will be forthcoming. I have had interests in companies that have had to act very very quickly to put something in place, a bit part for the ultimate showtime experience.

I am happy to vote yes in this situation knowing still the mc is just so poor not that these two issues are related. Name anyone who does not bellieve that Matt will try to make us a five hundred million dollar company.

In God we trust. It seems In Matt we trust more.