My star means nothing towards my likes, nor do I care about them. The star means I am a moderator and if you feel my response was rude, that is perhaps because you didn't like to be called a hypocrite.
No where did I ever say channel sampling could do anything for resource sizing, I simply suggested that your hypocrisy was obvious when you made assumptions of capital cost and resource size based on NO DATA except nearology, which is the most flimsy type of data then completely write off real sampling which gives an indication of whats there even if it's not going to represent or size the resource.
You're initial post, and this reply, show that you're two feet down with your opinion and you're willing to dig in to stay there. There is absolutely nothing I could reply that would shift your opinion so I won't waste my time, you don't want to be convinced, rather you want to try and show your intellectual chops. Well good show my friend.
I aimed this response and my last response at simply pointing out the hypocrisy in your post between not having accurate data yet making wild futuristic assumptions. I'll let the drill bit do the talking to me and then re-assess my opinion of the stock, rather than letting my imagination take me down the most extreme corridors of conflicting assumptions.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
