Carrste you surely are the one I like to read, but do you really think that what you wrote could be true?
ASN reported about dark shale in the historic samples of GB2 they even posted a photo of them. Do you really think the MGM ist that inexperienced and silly that they didn't know that there was at least some oil in the samples they collected from GB2? Are you saying the MGM ist so incompetent and naive that they didn't know this wetlab in Nevada could handle the problem with oil? Do you really think the Wetlab just told them "the analysis of the samples has been more complicated than expected and as a consequence the results have been delayed" (see ann of 01.03.2018)? Do you think the MNM said "ok no worries", without asking them to specify exactly what the problems were? Are you telling the lab was cheating on ASN making them loose Millions and that the MGM said bad luck we move on to OED? Do you thing the MGM is that amateurish?
I must say you must have a very poor opinion of the capacities of the MGM. I instead don't doubt about their experience, skills, abilities and competence and I don't doubt about commercial grades in GB2.
I'm just complaining that the MGM keept the small shareholders (not the big ones) in the darkness hiding information, giving also unnecessary uncareful timelines which they will not meet and confusing ANN like sending samples from Cane Creek to the Wetlab in Nevada.
I'm shocked how people can switch off they rationality defending the MGM is doing everything right.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
