Share
4,602 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 0
clock Created with Sketch. 02/03/18
17:30
Share
Originally posted by Bookface
↑
I don't know, the big thing for me is JC is part of Obama's 97% but she is a skeptic. She falls into the 97% because of the way the questions were "Framed" ... if your BS meter not at least registering just a tad... maybe you don't have one. You have the former Leader of the US (/ free world) using BS to push a point/political agenda. How many more of the so called 97% are questioning the "Science" but are too afraid of being called out. At least JC is brave (or maybe foolish) enough to step out of the pack. If she said nothing she may not have felt she needed to resign.
Expand
I’m confused. How does Obama come into this? As far as I’m aware, there’s no connection between him and the Cook et al. “consensus” paper. I suppose I wouldn’t be surprised if he cited it at some point, but you’re posting as if he owned it somehow.
