So, she accepts warming and that it is mostly human caused.
We've already discussed what I regard is her reckless view regarding risk management of the consequences of warming. And we've already discussed that she has an issue with models and their forecasts. I agree that is outside the questionnaire on the consensus.
But, now, given Judith agrees with anthropomorphic climate change, put your case why it's not dangerous and can be ignored, as Judith seemingly recommends. Allowing that the IPCC review of the science finds otherwise.
