Here are the author self rating questions. If Judith said she agreed with the consensus because of the way the questions were framed then she explicitly rejected the questionnaire choices that allowed her to state her paper(s) implied that
- humans have a minimal impact on global warming or
- humans caused less than 50% of global warming, or that
- her paper(s) did not address the cause of warming.
The position you claim she takes does not match up to reality.
---
"
Endorsement:
The second drop down indicates the level of endorsement for the proposition that human activity (i.e., anthropogenic greenhouse gases) is causing global warming (e.g., the increase in temperature).
Note: we are not asking about your personal opinion but whether each specific paper endorses or rejects (whether explicitly or implicitly) that humans cause global warming:
1 Explicit Endorsement with Quantification: paper explicitly states that humans are causing most of global warming.
2 Explicit Endorsement without Quantification: paper explicitly states humans are causing global warming or refers to anthropogenic global warming/climate change as a given fact.
3 Implicit Endorsement: paper implies humans are causing global warming. E.g., research assumes greenhouse gases cause warming without explicitly stating humans are the cause.
4 Neutral: paper doesn't address or mention issue of what's causing global warming.
5 Implicit Rejection: paper implies humans have had a minimal impact on global warming without saying so explicitly. E.g., proposing a natural mechanism is the main cause of global warming.
6 Explicit Rejection without Quantification: paper explicitly minimizes or rejects that humans are causing global warming.
7 Explicit Rejection with Quantification: paper explicitly states that humans are causing less than half of global warming.
"
