ok lets dig this up again,
It appears that some are happy to make up there own assessment on what the lower stratosphere is doing. It is obvious that the narrative of global warming, climate change or of late now we have moved onto climate extremes. The old fingerprint data now requires some tweaking to keep the sheep happy.
First up I have posted on this thread many references as to where and WHAT NOAA think the Lower stratosphere is doing. Obviously RSS and UAH think the lower stratosphere is DOING THE SAME.
Figure 6. Globally averaged temperature anomaly time series for the Temperature Lower Stratosphere (TLS). The plot shows the cooling of the lower stratosphere over the past 3 decades. This cooling is caused by a combination of ozone depletion and the increase of greenhouse gases. During the most recent decade, the rate of cooling has reduced substantially. (Click on the figure to go to the time series browse tool.)
I have also posted on what the IPCC and NASA have stated about the lower stratosphere here.
All of which do not support the mantra of global warming. Even the IPCC have acknowledged that stratosphere temperatures are NOT COOLING! I have posted ealier.
So for some really dumb ass reason mjp2 and a few other followers are patting themselves on the back.
Guys as I keep saying please take your argument and your distaste of RSS and also the Other recognised data suppliers of lower stratosphere data in UAH back to the people who have categorically used the VERY same data to claim it as a fingerprint of the settled science.
Then as YOU feel so STRONGY about THEIR interpretation of the data get them to offer a RETRACTION on their wild absurd claims from the PAST if you believe their USE of the TLS data IS WRONG
Once that is done then perhaps you turkeys may have some credibility as opposed to having a go at the messenger trying to get the message across to the sheep.
Reference back over here. Pretty sad state of affairs watching someone trying to get a message across!
OH,
PS if you guys are going to use AMSU data. Please use current data. using data that stops in 2013 is pretty amateurish of you guys. Granted the SHEEP have no idea but I expect better from the messiah and pretend messiah
Tristanc and Mjp have used less than 15 years of data with a cherry picked start and end point for the regression line to argue against NOAA, NASA and the IPCC by TELLING them there interpretation of SATELLITE data is incorrect!
It really cannot get any better than that guys
lol!
