Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

VOC vocus group limited

1.56%

$2.28

Totally agree. The earlier stewards in these situations fess up...

First 34 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
G650er

296 Posts.

14

27/02/18

14:24

Post #: 31381954
Share

Originally posted by DeltaHedge ↑

Don't disagree.

They are more than likely being 'forced' to sell the NZ arm by the Syndicate Lenders as based on forecasts, they are probably projected to breach the covenant once it drops to 3.0x (hence the rush to lock in a sale before 30 June 17). Yes I know they have mentioned they won't breach but that's just management doing what they do best and preventing a scare in the market. Management can get away with this by providing a 'reasonable' forward estimate that shows they won't breach (which they are doing right now), and can keep kicking the can down the road until 30 June 2018 results are in.

I wouldn't say the NZ business is liquid but more illiquid. Hence, no point selling an accretive earnings business with EBITDA of +$60m for the ASC. They could use an alternatve funding source -> raise capital. I think they have a prime opportunity now that Horth has left. Use him as the scapegoat, and say 'unforeseen expenses or capex' have arisen now he is gone. Raise capital, and pay off debt right now from $1.06b to $0.9b. This has a couple benefits - interest expenses are reduced, cash flow improves and with this improved cash flow use it to fund the ASC in 2019. Then, in 2019 you have a business with EBITDA of $380m (NZ and ASC earnings retained) compared to EBITDA of $300m (post NZ sale).

Covenants:

NZ + ASC
$0.9b / $380m = 2.34x (NZ $60m EBITDA and ASC contributes $20m EBITDA)

Post NZ
$0.75b / $320m = 2.34x (ASC contributes $20m EBITDA)

Hence, retaining NZ and ASC is more benficial as EBITDA is greater but debt covenant remains the same.

What about earnings you say as shares are diluted, well if they raise capital at $2.50 per share then they will need to issue 60m new shares ($2.50 x 60m = $150m cap raise).

Comparison of earnings:

NZ + ASC
EBITDA of $380m / 622.2m + 60m new shares = $0.55

Post sale of NZ
EBITDA of $320m / 622.2m + zero new shares = $0.51

Again, retaining NZ and ASC is more beneficial.

Further to this, during FY19-20 they could do a share buyback (as EBITDA is now $380m), buyback $150m worth of shares which is the original cap raise -> this will up the EPS resulting in a significant uplift in share price.

I think they need to play the market better right now.

Expand

Totally agree. The earlier stewards in these situations fess up and come clean by raising equity, the better. The problem is John Ho loses face BIG TIME if they do that.

VOC Price at posting: $2.44 Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Not Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Expert Exchange: US-Iran ceasefire – What it means for markets, oil, and the Middle East

The ASX Today: Treading water as banks climb, and WiseTech controversy escalates

CHW

Chilwa Minerals triples size of Mpyupyu West HMS discovery in Malawi

LISTEN: HotCopper Wire Podcast #051 – The President who cried peace

Tuesday's HotCopper trends: Ioneer, Conrad Asia Energy, Santos, and other daily topics

First 34 Last

Add to My Watchlist

What is My Watchlist?

A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Totally agree. The earlier stewards in these situations fess up...

Top Stories

Expert Exchange: US-Iran ceasefire – What it means for markets, oil, and the Middle East

The ASX Today: Treading water as banks climb, and WiseTech controversy escalates

Chilwa Minerals triples size of Mpyupyu West HMS discovery in Malawi

LISTEN: HotCopper Wire Podcast #051 – The President who cried peace

Tuesday's HotCopper trends: Ioneer, Conrad Asia Energy, Santos, and other daily topics

Featured News