Short watch, page-6

I think you’re missing the point here Yoda.

I’m not disagreeing with you that the shares may have gotten ahead of themselves at near $8 but they’ve since fallen 30% to their present levels and whether you like it or not, shorts have definitely played a role in this.

As I wrote in my previous post, I was ‘leaving valuations aside’ and looking at it purely from a short perspective. Some readers (myself included) find this dynamic just as interesting as the company itself. If you don’t that’s fine, but maybe steering clear of this thread called ‘short watch’ would be a good starting point. Just a thought..