Resource, page-25

Absolutely correct. This very thread invited comparisons, and we should not shirk away from that because we all want to make informed investment decisions.

As long as it's civil, it is proper that we test our various assumptions from time to time. After all, we all want to make a buck. If I thought KRC was a better prospect, I would sell up and jump ship. I, and all long term holders, are well in the money, so what's to stop us?

I remain convinced that AVL is the most feasible Vanadium prospect in Australia.

As an aside, our friend tweeted this, this morning.

The Ann from $KRC yesterday peer comparison very misleading IMO. Conc. grade a red herring! High head grade, low SiO2 and energy input, and min. 100uM grind size are key for lowest cost $AVL Na-roast-aqueous leaching step. $KRC acid-roast cost prohibitive. No dice. D;