Share
12,466 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 88
clock Created with Sketch.
11/04/18
19:34
Share
Originally posted by dolcevita
↑
I'm simply asking for consistency. But you contradict yourself in the next post.
Several times!
It's your right to post in here, but it goes to credibility.
Apart from that, look at this one:
I am curious to see how the Australians are going to feel about this project getting built.
OK. You want to know how we feel? Our feelings? When you know that some of us are onto the fact that deal has shafted us. Then you rather improbably offer us 'hope'? And you say you're not here to gloat? What else is that? We've always had hope, and you're not offering us more of it, far less than we had, actually.
But there's more...then rather incredibly...
The fortunes of the company are going to depend largely on that sentiment.
WHAT? In which universe does funding depend on the sentiment of a few minority shareholders? You can't be serious. You know that's a fabrication with the strength of toilet paper.
Then there's this:
A lot of optimism will help to encourage favorable financing, which will be key to investor confidence and a bright future.
In which world are you living? HC sentiment does NOT influence funding. I can tell you that quite categorically. Find me a financier of any repute who will confirm your claim.
No, you're having a lend. It's a windup. ....But not here to gloat .
Expand
Maybe the thought of a legal challenge has these Canadians a bit worried.
The last thing they want is shareholder revolt.
That makes sense of the veiled threat in that, if you're not all optimistic it can damage the ability to raise finance....