Recent MIT announcement, page-3

@bettyp

"Ask not for whom the bell tolls...."

The isse for MIT will be quantity. The issue for FGR is also quantity. For now FGR as a perishable lead, but like MIT - no sales. MIT probably looks more expensive for now too, but that won't last either.

I have been banging on about QA etc from nearly 18 mths... rusty old bukets, no idea where the material came from..certainly not from the SL Govt material, and no idea which vein, and where in the vein material came from.

Well known that the centre of a vein is better quality and more crystalline than the edges, and more crystalinne with depth.

If you are a hi-tech industry working in clean rooms wearing white clean room suits all day, what do you think your view of rusty old buckets containing chipped graphene off the mine floor being the source of your business? And if somehow rejects start appearing... where do you start looking and how do you figure out?

FGR will be fine for paint and cement and printing, basic commodities, but not the high end stuff where reproducability and consistency and traceability are a premium. MIT will meet that need.

The absence of a management team that actually has a broad science understanding is showing...one man can not undo the issues of the other three.

Can't be clearer ......