In this post you are just confirming everything that I have said.
You just ignore the fact that I repeatedly said that you have valid points in your interpretations based on your time studying scripture. You seemed to repeatedly missed the point that I was just providing alternative points of view and that fuller and more comprehensive alternatives can be found on the internet.
You refuse to believe that others who have studied the scriptures and Greek, Biblical Hebrew and Biblical Aramaic could have different but valid interpretations to those of your own. Some have spent their entire lives devoted to theses studies. Not all of these just parrot the beliefs of some sect.
You claim that others are so set in their own beliefs that that they won't consider other beliefs - as if they have hit on some cosmic truths. I think that you display this attribute yourself. Like you they defend their positions to the hilt.
Anyway you have been prepared to study scripture and come to your own conclusions rather than just following the prescriptions of some cult like many do. The Watchtower publications are an obvious example. Some "bible studies" are just there to indoctrinate people into the beliefs of their sects.
In trying to get people who believe in the Trinity doctrine to look at alternative views, I use arguments similar to those that you use to persuade them that there are other views; I emphasize that they have valid points, but there are other valid points of view. Mostly they think that their beliefs are some sort of cosmic truth and refuse to consider alternatives.
"But anyway, on a serious note, thanks for your time and efforts, more than what some Christians do."
You are welcome. Some Christians just parrot what their lords and masters that lord over their sects tell them.
