24The Son of Man will go just as it is written about Him, but woe to that man by whom He is betrayed. It would be better for him if he had not been born.” 25ThenJudas,whowould betrayHim,said,“SurelynotI,Rabbi?”Jesus answered,“Youhave said it yourself.” 26While they were eating, Jesus took bread, spoke a blessing and broke it, and gave it to the disciples, saying, “Take and eat; this is My body.”
What are the implications of this? Well, Jesus is God and as such can see the future and if He does not like what He sees then He has the power to change it. He looks ahead and sees Judas betraying him and through his betrayal condemning himself but nevertheless Jesus does nothing to change the course of events. Worst, with the Son of Man having to go just as it was written about Him, the fate of Judas had already been decided probably even before the beginning of time.
Clearly that either Jesus is a god without power or a god that lacks goodness.
This story does also raise another question, which is this: When did God Father decide to have his son to be crucified on this hearth in order to save us? Was it before He created Adam, or afterwards?
If it was before then before creating Adam God Father already knew that Adam was going to sin but nevertheless did not change His plans, which makes Him accessory in sin. If it was after then obviously that God Father was unable to foresee the consequences of His acts and therefore cannot be said to be perfect or even a responsible being.
