"Blind Freddy can see your posts are correct.
What Blind Freddy cannot see or understand are your motives "
When it comes to participating in exchange of views and information about investments, isn't factual accuracy ultimately what matters?
What difference does the personal motivation of posters make, as long as what they post is correct, and not wrong, misleading or deceptive?
Surely you don't care about the back stories of individual HotCopper members, such as where they might live, what clothes they wear and what their other personal domestic circumstances might be, as long as what they say is factually credible, which will reliably inform your investment decisions?
Asked another way:
If what I posted was still accurate, but was
positive in nature, would you then still indulge in speculation of what my motives might be?
"Your posts have no economic substance ( from a non- holder and philanthropic contributor perspective). In taxation terms , otherwise known as a 'scheme'."
And what "scheme" do you think I am busy hatching,
@Anjo-Roch?
[*]
Or is that just one of the many unsubstantiated one-liners that get glibly thrown out there to discredit others?
Like the many other "schemes", in which people who are not unequivocally positive about MSB, have allegedly been involved over time? Schemes such as being paid to post, either as employees of Macquarie Bank, big pharma, or short-sellers?
Is that the sort of "scheme" to which you are inferring?
[*] I'll wager anything I'll receive no straight answer to this question.
