My point is that we need to TU a post even if we disagree with it, IF it's well argued.
That is regardless of what you think of that person (and I don't care if you or anyone else doesn't like me personally. Really. I don't).
...anyway I TU posts from people I think have made unkind remarks about me personally. And will continue to do so.
The rigour of discussion is impaired if people decide en masse to stop posting if they can't tolerate a different view, or need to continually make personal criticisms, or to simply ridicule.
Nobody has been more positive about ADO's technology than me.... Make no mistake! What I've disagreed with is management mistakes and blame-shifting.
That's a general statement.
So it's a sad development when discussion becomes personalised. Which it clearly has been!
Back on topic:
Surely you noticed that Stefan is expressly stating he's implementing the approach of the current Chairman, John Hurrel.
BTW I find it interesting that people are now so supportive of Stefan E as they are about AnteoCoat as part of the new branding.
Nobody is talking Mix n Go branding anymore, it's gone the way of the dodo.
Let me just say: That's terrific! Not before time!
(But who was behind that new branding approach, and the approach of outsourcing to independent testers? Hurrel).
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
