Originally posted by redpencil
Yes that is obvious to most people. Also temperature corrections are absolute values and are not dependent on other readings, either earlier or later. Corrected temperatures have shown less warming than the raw data. The repetative continued nonsense from Mr T is not going to change the outcome.
You can see the true NASA corrected and uncorrected data and the methods used in the following link. Both the corrected and
uncorrected temperatures are plotted according to a 1960 to 1990 average temperature baseline of zero. Over that period there is virually no difference in the corrected and uncorrected baselines
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www...stments-affect-global-temperature-records/amp
But you are wrong. And this is what I have been pointing out, if you don't adjust the temps, then the baselines don't matter.
But that is not whats happening. They keep adjusting this data, something they cant do when we switch to 1991-2020.
