GISS are at data fiddling again, page-38

Thank you for the decency of a retraction and apology.

"I am wondering why or how I got that wrong. Obviously I was too quick of the mark."

You got that wrong because you are looking at the science with prejudice. It's as simple as that. Your analysis is consistently slanted and you fail to look through the most obvious denial spin.

As a result you are an agent for vested interest funded denial blog site misinformation. And have been for years. If your blinkers are innocent they are certainly firmly attached.