you're repeating yourself
and, as far as I can see, you are repeating a fraud
they've been using the 1951-80 baseline as long as I can find, see examples in my previous post
oh, look, here, back in 2012, NASA using the 1951-1980 baseline
https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012-temps.html
Gee jopo, you're talking bulldust again
do you have no scruples
or do you not fact check your sources at all
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- GISS are at data fiddling again
GISS are at data fiddling again, page-32
-
Top Stories
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)