Well petal, if 'peer review' is your measure of efficacy why do...

Well petal, if 'peer review' is your measure of efficacy why do you posit company announcements as 'factual' - none of which are peer reviewed - not to mention all the HC punter posts which are certainly not peer reviewed.

I would have thought that the input off a MSc geology student with a specialist interest in the geology of Dobsina who has probably visited the site many times would be worth taking notice of. At least as much as a non-geologist local! And certainly more than most here!

Amazingly, all you can do is criticise the absence of a peer review without addressing any of the interesting observations (such as the 1992 drilling results) - and even more amazingly, 6 people congratulate you for the ctiticism - despite the fact that the article is positive - albeit modestly - about success of the EUC venture.

Such is the power of groupthink and the often low brow level of discussion and input on the HC threads.