Well hullo chaps.
1. Class action. It's been a whole month since I said a CA is almost guaranteed, no CA has been served in that time, and @DDMHC you're claiming that as a victory? You don't really know how these things work, do you. Maybe let's revisit this in a year and assess the position then.
2. My statement about NTA and negative OCF. In your hella sick "burn" (o hai @wsDK_II) you've cited "$2m in profit before accounting depreciation" [sic], a 55% increase in gross profit, and debt reduction of $23m. Are you trolling, wilfully blind, deliberately obfuscatory, or simply obtuse? Because you've conveniently ignored the halving of NTA (21c v 42c in pcp, see page 2 of half yearly), the -$7.7m in OCF (page 12 of half yearly), and the drop in cash for the half from $33m to $12m despite $33m in asset sales. Ouch. Ouch. Somebody please put out that fire.
3. Yes, they've now shipped some head to China. If you think I wrongly assessed their announcement about that - the one that referred to the agreement being subject to both "conditions precedent" and "completion of all letter of credit requirements", then we'll have to agree to disagree.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
