Two things -1. I Agree with you Mctrain, on timming but with BB...

Two things -1. I Agree with you Mctrain, on timming but with BB being away in Europe till I think today - I cant help but suspect they will have to work on finalising JORC over easter and it probably wont be out till next week. (this is just IMO not some insde tip).
But admittedly a bit uncool to be a month later and then late again and not inform market - maybe well see it soften a bit?.......(hopefully) as I've more to buy. -im not gonna mess around in the oppies ive decided now im out. heads is good enough.

2. One other private bugbear I'd like to vent about is -that brave Bell Potter analyst saying they are upping their forecast Cobalt price to 75,000$ a ton- given price is 20% higher already - thats typical meek stuff. Its just another example of scared conservatism from a spineless and probably-over-paid analyst doing a diservice to their clients simply to cover their own ass. For example -What if Co price goes to 100,000 a ton and stays above for 2 years -as most forecasters are predicting. -and any realistic observation of the market facts point-towards- or if goes to 150,000$ a ton- which is almost as likely as $75,000 a ton ? - BP Clients would then could have missed some good Cobalt opportunities by that wimpy, ass-covering analyst being too conservative - frankly its just the same as people getting stuffed by being too bullish.

IMO Conservative calls should be offset by intelligant bullish scenarios (my job on CLA!!)

SO I agree with blu-Afro- best would be for CLA to take conservative low price scenario call to show the bottom line of profitability - plus then to make a realistic/optimistic scenario to show how much this thing REALLY can make Just make your own calls guys -look ahead intelligently at the facts and screw the spineless, conservative looking-out-for-their-jobs-first analysts.

but anyway - call me old fashioned? but IMO JORC's dont normally go into price forecastings models anyway do they??- thats the scoping study- JORC's normally just show whats proven in the ground not extraction profictability models? do correct me if im wrong.