Not entirely, rather the info was available elsewhere. Enjoyed some of the data presented and some of the commentary, but I could see a lot of bias built into the thinking.
Be careful what you dismiss out of hand. ad hominem infallacy and all that. I've spent my life working with dirty data. It's all dirty. You gather data around a thing to learn about it. You don't take any one POV or source as the Bible. Not even the Bible. Certainly not a another guy.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
