CEO gone now, page-9

I'm not sure what your talking about, i haven't mentioned the chairperson

this is a thread called ...CEO gone now,

the above was the admission I'm talking about which is from within the apology this morning,

I was  suggesting his long term bonuses shouldn't be paid given the admissions which have caused him to resign with immediate effect.......... or at least I hope so for shareholders sake

And I'm questioning why a law firm, sent in to do a review following a ASIC undertaking changed its reports numerous times after talking with BOD, even some reports suggest they removed the ceo's name..............
I find it odd that people going in can change a report based on discussions with the business bod whose business is the subject of the review - seems like a stupid system of review to me and somewhat of a huge conflict