Originally posted by LuckyMojo
There is no explanation for a 100 years of warming without the use of data tampering .
to both
@LuckyMojo an
@Tee47 re above posts
Raw data shows more warming than adjusted over that time.
Maybe you want to have another go at that?
https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-how-data-adjustments-affect-global-temperature-records
"
Over the full 1880-2016 period, the
adjusted data actually warms more than 20% slower than the raw data. The large adjustments before 1950 are due almost entirely to changes in the way ships measured temperatures (more on that later).
"
You've seen this before right?
I mean this has been posted on these threads maybe a hundred or more times over the last ten years.
And you guys wonder why it's called denial?
In my book it's willful, mindless, fudging stupidity. "Cognitive dissonance" is polite. "Denial" is being polite.
But hey, how long is it going to take before moronic is a valid descriptor?
