Look at the H18 report. Again, a very rushed commentary...

Look at the H18 report. Again, a very rushed commentary /narrative. Otherwise how else to explain something me of the basic mistakes that have been included (text based and table based). For the tables, look for example at the table on p5. Note the 2x 30 June 2017 columns. Ditto the language under “Principal Activities” and the near on uncontrolled (copious) references (interchangeably, so it would seem) between - Company, Group, board, ADFG, ADFG directors, etc (all in the space of 2.1/4 pages of commentary). Such mistakes are simply too basic to get wrong. Or, are they?