Fair point, of course it sounds like Intiger will attempt to be...

Fair point, of course it sounds like Intiger will attempt to be the leaders in this whole new industry; their motives and confidence are bang on fantastic.
That they've been working closely with banks for many months gives me great confidence as it suggests a great depth to working relationships with banks, as evidenced by the role of Mark Rantall, Nina Tan and more recently with George Jaja.
Yep; a huge number of positives, which I'm not discounting.

But, I'm obsessed with trying to find weaknesses and chinks in Intiger's armour.
I want to know how Intiger can fail.
Then I can make balanced decisions as a holder.
Ain't no point in shouting out about the positives of Intiger, yet failing to think 5 steps ahead about where the ship could sink, eh?

I'd like to invite more discussion on Intiger could fail.

I proffer the following reasons;
- As HAC30 said; the jury is still out about how good the software is currently.
- In my experience, software has a 'shelflife'. A top of the range IBM computer in 1980s seems to not be top of the range in the year 2018!
- Some Mark Zuckerberg character could come along with better software and a more novel idea and wipe Intiger off the map, no?
- Intiger is operating in a dynamic intellectual space where no one really knows about the effect of AI/robotics, and where it's possible/probable that one horse will overtake another over the course of the race.

Just some thoughts, that's all.

WB