Ann: CBA Update and Key Intiger Appointment, page-117

Fair point, of course it sounds like Intiger will attempt to be the leaders in this whole new industry; their motives and confidence are bang on fantastic.
That they've been working closely with banks for many months gives me great confidence as it suggests a great depth to working relationships with banks, as evidenced by the role of Mark Rantall, Nina Tan and more recently with George Jaja.
Yep; a huge number of positives, which I'm not discounting.

But, I'm obsessed with trying to find weaknesses and chinks in Intiger's armour.
I want to know how Intiger can fail.
Then I can make balanced decisions as a holder.
Ain't no point in shouting out about the positives of Intiger, yet failing to think 5 steps ahead about where the ship could sink, eh?

I'd like to invite more discussion on Intiger could fail.

I proffer the following reasons;
- As HAC30 said; the jury is still out about how good the software is currently.
- In my experience, software has a 'shelflife'. A top of the range IBM computer in 1980s seems to not be top of the range in the year 2018!
- Some Mark Zuckerberg character could come along with better software and a more novel idea and wipe Intiger off the map, no?
- Intiger is operating in a dynamic intellectual space where no one really knows about the effect of AI/robotics, and where it's possible/probable that one horse will overtake another over the course of the race.

Just some thoughts, that's all.

WB