Hmm. Investing money isn't entertainment. Not sure why you think it should be entertaining in HC either.
To my way of thinking, understanding your investment is an essential and should be a constant process. It's one reason you need a dialectic in discussion.
Overcoming conceptual issues, difficult-to-understand technical issues, and commercial realities are included in that process. The fact that so much of any company's activities and deliberations are guesswork is a problem.
Understanding the stock is much harder than many assume it is. It explains why sometimes people feel betrayed and lash out. The person giving an alternative view should be valued. Often they're hated instead. Unkind remarks are part of the territory in here. I accept this. But I don't like it, obviously.
FWIW also all law firms develop and use templates, precedents, proformas and build on them. Unsurprisingly, government legal offices do as well. IP firms are unlikely to draft one for confidentiality and access, from absolute zero even if from our point of view, it's new.
But I conceded the point to try to draw out some goodwill. Only half successful there.... but never mind!
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
