"better" ... they're gonna have to. For the testing. You don't...

"better" ... they're gonna have to. For the testing. You don't get that huh?
It would be wise (why I don't expect you to do it) to ask why they aren't already having or releasing results from, testing from slow printed samples.

Cause this testing will need to happen with each different powder type, and the alloys. It's unrealistic (my oft repeated analysis of A3D and rampers stated objectives for the stock since it first surged through $1, eg: "binary"), to expect anything disruptive to be right in it's first iteration.

This theory applies also to resolution (first iteration 1.0 will likely NOT be effective).

This theory applies also to print speed.

So, regardless of your speculation on whether A3D will eventually have a viable LFP, do you really expect it to be on the first iteration in 2019? If they make that target that is.

And if, in the unlikely event thatA3D can outstrip the billions of dollars worth of manpower and research and private companies are putting in, and belie the most common scientific reality; even in that unlikely event, do you really believe that there is a queue of buyers there already? Or that perhaps that will take some time as well, getting the message out there.

Even after all that eceptional performance, outdoing a world full of geniuses, A3D will still have to negotiate OEM partnerships with manufacturers. They not gonna give up their parts business free... a little more time.

So again, I reiterate, without ANY SUGGESTION WHATSOEVER that A3D won't make a viable LFP, the expectations here for commercialisation are still way unrealistic.

Feel free to ignore that analysis CK, it's not really meant for true believers, more for people who want to assess all outlooks.

Escrow release coming up is going to deliver some hard truths.