Good post Elee agree with most of what you say . Its cool to...

  1. 9,532 Posts.
    Good post Elee agree with most of what you say . Its cool to share ideas and thoughts - add a few more if I may.
    Against Geelong you didn't really need to have a ruck-man because they didn't have one either.
    The power were forced to play the wings and retain possession because the Geelong defense set up so well all game - a task made easier for them by the fact that the port forward set up was pretty awful - imo Westhoff has to be a forward target because dixon and particularly watts don't present.

    The port small forwards only played in patches - I thought Neade was going to have a standout game but what happened after his early goals, Wingard isn't a shadow of his former self. something port fans should consider is why Impey is making such an impact at hawthorn - if hawthorn target someone they usually get it right, so from all the small speedy forwards available they chose him. port need to get a better recruiting team in place and better list management.

    Ports problems began before the season started and it was plain to see and anybody with a brain said it - you can't recruit a whole stack of has-beens who never were. Lindsay Thomas - for christ's sake why would you want him and then brag about it as a recruiting coup? Motlop was a passenger at Geelong and rarely impacted - in a lesser team like port it will be a rarity to see him impact on the scoreboard.
    Watts was a number one draft pick but his use by date to deliver on that expired many years ago - he's performing better than i thought he would - but that still ranks him as mediocre at best. Thought Rockliff was their best shot but I think injuries may be hampering him - he hasn't set the world on fire when he has played and I'm sort of thinking he may not fit into the port style of play even when he is on song.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.