Yeah dibs.
The things that concerns me and some other non posting Nor thread readers (holders who text message me about it), is how extreme and excessive it is, both for (when holding) and against (since sold).
..but also, if it is even fit for HC guidelines, let alone legal.
I mean, fair enough.. if someone likes a stock, does some upramping in the hope of encouraging a few buys to help the share price climb above the buying price of a trade.. and if they change their mind and bit of a downramp in frustration... we can put up with it, and many posters do it.
But, in this situation.. myself and others picked up on the sudden extremties, and when I raised the point, there was a reply that they had just realised this "missing" revenue in the past week, and wasn't aware of it prior (when holding), to the point where it now much flood the thread and be sent to ASIC (haha!).
I'm glad you took the time to look at some previous posts.. and then the upramping post about the identical issue, while suggesting nor was able to get 700% increases from 1.7 (12c).
Then when questioned about misleading by admitting they did obviously know about the issue when upramping it.. in my opinion is an admission of deceit, manipulating and misleading a forum.. is that legal? Fair enough there's probably many who subtly up/down ramp for an agenda, but basically owning up to it and pushing on... maybe Asic would be more interested in that itself?
Looks like we just have to continue waiting for proper news from nor, so there's overall positivity once again, and big deals to talk up and be proud of. Surely something is "imminent"!
Expand