repetitive negativity, autocratic method of delivery, debate v manipulation
Quoting back negative accusations risks giving them traction they don't otherwise have. But seriously this is getting repetitive.
Could you just stick to the topic instead of making personal attacks?
You do that with impunity, relying on the fact that I'm not petty enough to have you moderated.
BTW the topic is the completion of the trial. And it's a positive! How does this positive get buried under a mountain of accusations?
You can save an incredible amount of time by focusing on the journey of the share price
Thanks for the 'advice' but the topic is completion of the trial.
Plus all I need to know about this stockprice journey is that there is a concentration of ownership, it's trading on low volumes and is one of the most shorted stocks on the ASX. Who are you really addressing your comments to? Surely not me? I've made my views clear on this for years now. You can hardly be ignorant of them.
The rest of your post is an attempt to seize the moral high ground. When I see shorters cynically putting a company under pressure, when it is helping sick people with stem cells...and then we get posters berating those who seek to call them out.... Why would anyone do that?
And btw, the completion of the enrolment of Phase 3 is excellent news.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
