Hi @Vector - Not really sure your queries, it seems a bit scatter gun approach - just out of curiosity wondering what your background is such that can have a discussion in a technical or not so technical manner!
I believe in your cost estimates, you are really arguing over insignificant costs in the bigger picture of things when comparing laterite and sulphide projects (is this what we are discussing about?)
Of course this is all subject to comparisons to other projects/resources out there in the world.
Again, it all really comes down to laterite vs sulphide debate.
For your benefit attached are couple of slides from the Roadshow presentations - please take note of :
1) Low Acid Requirements emphasised
2) Classical Process such as Copper SX-EW and Cobalt Sulphate crystallisation can be used for saleable products
I still maintain, in my opinion, due to the shortage of Cobalt and context of events, interested parties will show CONCRETE interest in sulphide projects around the world due to the comparison of processing costs between the two types.
We will see who interested parties are in due time that come forth for CLA - however I am hearing on the so called grapevine that there are quite a few parties interested.
I believe management being armed with an initial JORC resource and later a Scoping Study will be suited to tackle interested parties on terms to suit shareholders.
We will see
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
