brily said: ↑
I note that Michael Pascoe has written an article in the SMH about the need for an enquiry into ASIC labelling it an embarassment. I have not read the article since it has a paywall but I could not agree more and SGH is a prme example being allowed to trade with not nearly enough questions being asked and shareholders being kept in the dark. IMO ASIC has never fultilled its purpose right from the start. The SEC in the US seems to be more proactive have much more teeth and it uses them effectively. In this case SH should have been much better protected by both ASIC and the ASX. But I fear nothing will come of it as usual.
Jim and Brily,
There is no protection for shareholders and it will not happen.
The only way is look at thew charts and put a stop loss and close your ears to all what the directors say and all the noise.
Otherwise investors will keep loosing their hard earned money
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
