Is anyone more experienced able to say just how much input a managing director has on a Scoping Study and the "finer details"
Auralia(sp?) are employed to do the Scoping Study with obvious inputs from other various parties, however am I correct in stating that ultimately it is Auralia who make the decisions?
From my point of view - it would seem more damaging to use a relatively high price - in my opinion as long as they can show to the market that the project is viable at the lowest Cobalt price possible then this would be enough it would seem
The PFS (pre-feasibility study) would of course expand in greater detail and perhaps use a higher price (assuming Cobalt prices increase)
I know this is a thread for the JORC and apologies
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
