https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quo...&sym=PME.AX&grid=1&height=500&studyheight=100
https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quo...&sym=APX.AX&grid=1&height=500&studyheight=100
Take the positives from these two multibaggers PME and APX.
4.5 years ago, you could buy PME for 40-50c and it has grown into an $8 stock without much fanfare and without an active HC forum. It could sustain the climb because each year it continued to plough better results. However, even when it was at 40-50c , it should be noted that their annualised revenues for 2012 was already > $10m and in 2013, their half yearly began to show profit from operations , which is when their sp began its upward march. So in 2012-13, its business model was already validated before its sp began its march. I don't have to go into APX because most know this has been a proven success story.
Point made here is that the first hurdle of revenue achievement ($5m and growing) is truly important and we have the above two cases above where you don't put the horse before the cart. Once revenue achievement is made , then the market looks towards cashflow positive (which M7T failed to meet and SKF showing prospect) and then profits. This is why I indicated that IMO there are many tech stocks that have valuations ahead of their current progress. A handful may make it to be a PME/APX but my guess is that a majority would not and be subsequently sidelined. IMO the less 'celebrated' stocks with management focus on delivery of results (as opposed to dishing out announcements on non-material commercial collaborations) would be better placed to emulate these two success stories.
- Forums
- ASX - General
- Tech Stocks Compared (Update)
Tech Stocks Compared (Update), page-14
-
Top Stories
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
